Nikon D300 digital SLR camera review by What Digital Camera

You're browsing: Home » kids digital cameras » Blog article: Nikon D300 digital SLR camera review by What Digital Camera

Nikon D300 digital SLR camera review by What Digital Camera

Posted on October 25th, 2009 by admin

http://www.kidsdigitalcamera.com – another great video brought to you by Kids Digital Camera folks.

Related posts:

Filed under: kids digital cameras

« Museum of Science Activities for Kids Nikon COOLPIX S710 Digital Camera »

25 Responses to “Nikon D300 digital SLR camera review by What Digital Camera”

coolinen2007, on May 5th, 2009 at 9:45 am Said:

I think dslr s too big and too expensive
they look old fashioned as well
J4ckM22, on May 16th, 2009 at 6:32 am Said:

Compared to a compact camera?

For professionals, or even amateurs, DLSRs are an invaluable resource. They produce way better pictures, and most people don’t care for the size.

Trust me, DLSRs are usually worth it if you’re serious about photography. If not, then a compact works fine
coolinen2007, on May 16th, 2009 at 7:38 am Said:

yes but how much dslr? around 2000$ plus lens
how much compact ? 300 $ .. small and you can take anywhere

and in day light or well lightened places.. picture quality is same

what is difference? when its dark average dslr is A LITTLE better and you can capture images fast for sports..
now you can change colors and noise in computer

so I believe dslr s are too much expensive for its abilities
compact all the way to go
0RobinHood1, on May 16th, 2009 at 9:54 pm Said:

have you solved the problem?
lauralbriar, on May 17th, 2009 at 8:42 pm Said:

There really is no comparison between a dSLR and a point and shoot compact. One is for professional, serious photography by people who look at photography as an art or a profession. The manual modes are there to actually work with. Point and shoot compacts are wonderful if all you want are snapshots to remember things by – but then you’d probably be happy with the camera on your cell phone just as well
istiklalcaddesi, on May 26th, 2009 at 10:07 am Said:

Well done to you!!! I will sell my D300 and 18-200 nikkor right now because of your “valuable” comments. Because you are very right picture quality is same for DSLRs and compact micky mouse toy cameras…

Well by the way I personally would recommend you to get your eyes checked, as you know there is a HUUUUUGEEEEEEEEEEE difference in the pictures taken by DSLR and compact cameras
shledron, on May 26th, 2009 at 12:42 pm Said:

Where did I mention compact cameras? Nowhere. Mong.
shledron, on May 26th, 2009 at 12:44 pm Said:

Nevermind, you replied to the wrong person.
johnyxrebel, on May 31st, 2009 at 5:10 pm Said:

compact cameras are alright for photography, but DSLR’s are still a lot better, you can change out different lenses and you can do so much more than you think. not all DSLR’s really cost that much i’ve seen really good ones for about $500 that were 12-15 mp brand new and i tested them out and they did fine. the compact or “point and shoot” cameras are just for people that want to take the picture quickly and move on without worrying about making adjustments
johnyxrebel, on May 31st, 2009 at 5:14 pm Said:

most compact cameras you will see huge differences, but there are some that i have seen like my kodak M1033, its a decent camera, i still prefer SLR’s and DSLR’s over all but its 10 mp and takes really good pictures, i only got it because it was cheap and i couldn’t afford a decent DSLR, but its a pain to try to get it to take a picture the way you want it to so SLR’s still beat compact cameras
coolinen2007, on June 1st, 2009 at 12:48 am Said:

yeah ofcourse you can change very different and quality lenses
1 good lense starts from 500 euro/$ and any dslr that you can find for 500$ not going to be any different then average compact

are you kidding me?
a good dslr set gonna cost something like 4000 $ minimum
I can sacrifice a little quality and both take pictures, videos and carry with me where ever i go with the prize of 400$
anyways
gnrendeiro, on June 4th, 2009 at 4:37 pm Said:

The DSLR’s are not about point and shoot, and you shouldn’t even compare them to compacts. With a compact you can print the usual 10*15cm photos, not Panels like 2*3m as you can do it with a DSLR. The size of the sensor does matter or you think that the medium format cameras are as good as the compact ones to? If you just want to take some family trip pictures, the compacts are better, but with a DSLR you can produce art. The D300 is one of the best cameras I’ve tried ever, if not the best.
lucky10boy, on June 9th, 2009 at 7:58 pm Said:

come on….. don’t be so naive. (-:
blztank, on June 26th, 2009 at 5:20 am Said:

Would you recommend this camera to a beginner getting into photography?
Note I’m looking for a professional grade camera that can take great quality pictures,I’m not a professional but I enjoy the art and would like to get started,I’m looking to take serious creative images what would you recomend?
GLXLR, on June 27th, 2009 at 7:25 pm Said:

Suggest you get a cheaper body and get better lenses… This camera will have a huge learning curve.
geonlansis, on July 4th, 2009 at 9:16 am Said:

if i knew i was going to be this interested in photography to begin with and need the features, i would have not gotten a D60 and should just gone for a D300 first. but then again, we’ll never know, and now i have both. but if you are willing to dig for more info on cameras and learn lots about how to use them and how to take good pictures, any decent one can be good enough. but the lens…it’s very important too, and it’s going to cost a lot!
kamikim1, on July 4th, 2009 at 5:55 pm Said:

can we compare this unit vs canon eos 50d
advice pls?
metalsinani, on July 24th, 2009 at 10:20 pm Said:

hey camera fans,
im looking at 2 cameras, either the canon eos 40d or the nikon d90.
my backgraound is as a skateboarding photographer (toungue in cheek but thats what im using it for) aswell as everyday travel photos as i go about my life lol
im struggling to dcide between the additional megapixels and aperture capobilities (high speed shooting in low light conditions) of the d90 or the 6.5 frames a second of the canon. soz if i mad any idioty mistakes in this, but all helps good
SassyMutts, on August 13th, 2009 at 3:50 am Said:

Good info in this video
jwcajwca, on August 25th, 2009 at 3:01 am Said:

No entendi nada, pero la tengo que comprar porque me gusta la fotografia y la necesito.
Capesports4, on August 30th, 2009 at 8:14 pm Said:

Go with the EOS 50D. Has a faster burst rate and has lower noise at at ISO 6400 than the D90. The 50D goes up to ISO 12,800 but has alot of noise at that level. However the D90 has video.
BarrackObamah, on September 18th, 2009 at 8:11 am Said:

Get the d90, simply of its video. If ur shooting in daylight all the time, all 6+ MP slr will produce good quality (unless ur doing large format professional printing). d90 and 40d has same image quality, but d90 has slightly better noise sensitivity than 40d, even slightly better than d300. You dont need extra 2 frame/ second. If u got more budget, i would get d300s or 7d. For me, i just got D300s upgrade from d80.
jvw2941, on September 20th, 2009 at 11:00 pm Said:

Yo pienso tu deber aprender sobre fotografia antes de comprar esto camara.
C906070, on September 24th, 2009 at 12:56 pm Said:

can i have the old D200 please?
ilovetyping, on October 22nd, 2009 at 12:11 am Said:

can anyone one plz answer this question for me.

for ex.
when u are taking a pic of a tree or any object. should the sun be behind the object or should the sun be behind u??

what difference will it make

thnks

Leave a Reply

Privacy Policy |